I know this is old news, but I can't get too excited about it. One one hand, Samuel had his shot at TB, was serviceable, but is a natural linebacker. The running back deal was a recruiting promise kept. Why wait to make the switch back now, especially considering they knew King was on thin academic ice and Ealey was out? On the other hand, if the coaches need to find another body to ensure the necessary depth to run the play book, who else do they pick?
There are two things that come to mind: One, they just don't trust one of the players they have at their disposal to be the player(s) they need at tailback, either as a co-number one or as a primary back up. That is puzzling and a bit strange. And scary as hell. Two, had Samuel been at LB his whole career, the coaches would not have to worry about moving him, as I believe he'd be too important to the defense to move around.
The constant position swapping is putting players' careers in bad places and is wasting talent. I realize we are very deep at places on the defense, but damn. At least Richard is in a good place about it.
Popular
-
SEC Teams as Big Lebowski charactersIt's been fifteen years since the greatest movie about bowling, White Russians, and/or rug ste…
-
Anything you can do, I can do betterI have to admit, it was surprising to see South Carolina's QB coach suspended for "public …
-
Not a trick playWe've had that hidden ball play action in our book since David Greene's days. I'm not …
-
3 Questions: Letting it Owl Hang OutPunny, I know. What does post Missouri let down look like? We've all seen this show before. Bi…
-
2008 ≠ 2013 for two important reasonsWho has two thumbs and isn't coaching Georgia's defense in 2013? Like Blutarsky , I read Je…
-
UGA Season Tix AvailableJust checked out our ticket partner and noticed plenty of UGA season tickets are still available. …
-
Hartman Fund football cut off todayBulldog fans, if you want season tickets to Georgia Football next Fall, the deadline to make your d…
Post a Comment
Post a Comment